Tag Archives: words

Donna K. Weaver’s Secret Sauce: Overused Words

Donna-Author Pic 2013by Donna K. Weaver

Some time ago, I was reading about the use of the word “that.” I’m quite fond of it and decided to do a search of my ms and see how many times I used it.

914 times.

I then did a search and replace, inspecting each use and evaluating it. I eliminated over 300 uses of that word. I noticed other instances where I could better phrase the sentences and get rid of some more. I didn’t want to make a lot of sentence structure changes then, so as I’m going through and looking for times to ‘show and not tell’ I’m also looking at that word.

Is that a filler word? Like the word ‘like’. You, like, you know, want to go, like, to the store, and you know, like you see this like hunky guy, you know, and you so drool on yourself.

English classes teach us really bad habits. I found that out the hard way—in business writing. Instructors would give us assignments to write a 500-word paper. What did we do? We wrote the longest, most complicated sentences we could imagine in order to hit that magical 500-word mark. All those extra words didn’t make our point better, didn’t make it easier to understand, and probably didn’t make it any more fun to read.

Then we get into the real business world where we’re told correspondence better not be longer than one page. Business people are busy and a lengthy letter is likely to be set aside. There’s an interesting article here with some suggestions for when to eliminate ‘that.’

“That” is an example of an overused word. There are lots of them. One good place to find out where some of yours might be is autocrit. You can plug in some of your writing and it will evaluate it—500 words for free. There are also other software programs that do this.

And our host, Jordan, has a Word macro which cuts and pastes all the sentences using your crutch words into a new document if you already know what your writing crutches are.

Do you know what words you overuse or rely on too much?

About the Author
a-change-of-plansDonna K. Weaver is a Navy brat who joined the Army and has lived in Asia and Europe. Because she sailed the Pacific three times as a child, she loves cruising and wishes she could accrue enough vacation time to do more of it with her husband. After recording city council minutes for twenty years, Donna decided to write something a little longer and with a lot more emotion–and kissing.

Donna’s first novel, A Change of Plans debuted earlier this month. When Lyn sets off on her supposedly uncomplicated and unromantic cruise, she never dreams it will include pirates. She finds herself drawn to Braedon, an intriguing surgeon—but her emotional baggage dashes her hopes for a happy ending. Paradise turns to piracy when their party is kidnapped and Lyn’s fear of a fairytale turns grim. Now she must fight alongside the man she rejected, first for their freedom and then against storms, sharks, and shipwreck.

Pet peeve #45,103

As a writer, I hate the word caused.

I know, I know, we shouldn’t hate any words. And yes, of course, caused is a valid word and has excellent usages, most of them in legal briefs.

Okay, okay, also in peer-reviewed, passive voice scientific papers.

Why do I hate caused? Because 90% of the time I see it in fiction, it’s in a verb phrase like this:

The sadness in her voice caused him to pause.

She jumped back, causing him to fall down.

Yeah, okay, they’re not inherently objectionable sentences. (Ha ha. Lawyer? Object?) But for the vast majority of sentences like these, the “cause” sounds external, overwritten and intrusive.

I may have some strong feelings on the matter.

What on Earth is wrong with just using the word “made“? Isn’t that what most of us would say? Isn’t it simpler and more elegant?

Most of all, when we use caused, we sound like this:

For our one year anniversary, my girlfriend caused myself to go to a Yankees game, with whomever amongst our friends can go. But, the Weather Channel just changed their forecast and the skies are grey, so we might go with the girl that lives next door to see the movie, “Iron Man 2”.

Yeah, I know, I’m my own brand of crazy.

What otherwise innocent words drive you crazy? (And don’t say you just hate the way “moist” or “moisture” sounds. I hate people who say that!)

Photo by Benny Lin

Stealing Word Nerd Wednesday!

I am absconding with Annette Lyon’s popular feature, Word Nerd Wednesday! Mwahaha! And to totally misappropriate it, I’m posting on a Friday!

I think you now understand how I write from my villains’ POVs.And speaking of characters, and keeping with our theme this month, I wanted to focus on two specific words that many people use interchangeably: sympathy and empathy. I realized that, while I sense a difference, I can’t really say for certain what it is. So I turned to some dictionaries.

Sympathy
From Merriam-Webster: a “relationship between persons or things wherein whatever affects one similarly affects the other,” “mutual or parallel susceptibility.” Also, the “inclination to think or feel alike.” The American Heritage Dictionary, via Answers.com, agrees: “A relationship or an affinity between people or things in which whatever affects one correspondingly affects the other.”

Empathy
From Merriam-Webster again: the primary definition is “the imaginative projection of a subjective state into an object so that the object appears to be infused with it.” The other meaning is “the action of understanding . . . and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experience of another.” The American Heritage definitions reverse the order: “Identification with and understanding of another’s situation, feelings, and motives” and “The attribution of one’s own feelings to an object.”

What’s the difference?
So let’s apply this to our characters. . . . Sympathy is an affinity between the character and the reader—when something happens to the character, the reader feels it. Or, to cut and paste one of the definitions again, it’s “the [readers’] act or power of sharing the feelings” of our characters.

Empathy, on the other hand, is the reader identifying with and understanding the character’s experiences and feelings, possibly to the level of vicariously experiencing them. Which, oddly enough, sounds very much like the same thing. However, Roget’s Thesaurus (via Thesaurus.com) gives an interesting distinction:

sympathy means the stimulation in a person of feelings that are similar in kind to those that affect another person; empathy means a mental or affective projection into the feelings or state of mind of another person

At the same time, it lists sympathy as a synonym for empathy and vice versa. So what is the difference? Let’s dig deeper: get out your etymology gear.

(Um, guys, what’s with the bee suits and the bug jars? I said etymology, not entomology. . . .)

Etymology
Sympathy and empathy aren’t just extremely similar concepts; they’re very similar words with similar roots. (This is a shout out to the great state of North Carolina, which required me to learn word roots my senior year of high school.)

  • em– is a Greek prefix that’s found in words like instill, imbue, endow and embed. As you can see from those examples, they all mean “in” in some way—to put in, to spread in, to place in, etc.
  • sym– is a Greek prefix found in words like symphony, symmetry, synesthesia and synecdoche (um . . . don’t worry about the definitions on those two 😉 ). Those examples aren’t the most transparent, but it means “with,” or “together.”
  • pathos is a Greek word meaning feelings—or suffering.

So empathy would be instilling the character’s suffering in the reader, while sympathy would be making the reader suffer with the character. Still sounds pretty similar, doesn’t it?

So, really, what’s the difference?
The bottom line: there really isn’t that big a difference between the definitions of empathy and sympathy. ‘Round these parts, I’ve used “sympathy” to denote the ultimate goal of “reader identification”—inducing the reader to feel what the character feels, and to understand those feelings deeply. “Empathy,” in this paradigm, would be one technique used to instill those feelings.

So happy Word Nerd Wednesday. On Friday. And here, instead of Annette’s blog. (And no, actually, I didn’t ask Annette’s permission. But now I ask her forgiveness. *bats eyelashes* Please? I did it as a favor when you said you were so busy you didn’t post WNW this week. And while this is no Ellis Island mythbusting, I hope that this is an acceptable offering.)

What do you think—is this a distinction without a difference? Or are their nuances in the commonly accepted connotations of “sympathy” and “empathy” that dictionaries fail to capture?

Photo by Steve Woods