All posts by Jordan

Writing Wednesday V

Welcome back to Writing Wednesday! Since so many of us are writers, I know we all must read lots of writing blogs. So let’s share some of the great things we learn about writing through a fun new linkup! It’s like a blogfest, only easier!Writing Wednesday

Last time, we had seven really great entries:

Aaaaand the winner of the $20 Amazon gift card, chosen at random is . . .

Ronda Hinrichsen

Congrats, Ronda—I’ll get that on its way to you ASAP.

Share your best posts on writing today! Note that there isn’t a drawing this week, but keep your eyes peeled for the next one!

What are the rules?

  1. All articles must directly relate to writing. If you see something that makes you think of a writing principle, and you want to participate, I recommend you blog about your thoughts, and then submit your blog post.
  2. You should use a descriptive name so we all want to click on the article: Jordan McCollum wouldn’t be very enticing, but Doing Backstory Right would.
  3. Articles can come from your blog or someone else’s.
  4. If it’s your post, PLEASE link back to Writer Wednesday in the post so your visitors can join in the fun! (You can use the badge below—the code includes a link!) Seriously, guys: it only benefits everyone in the linkup. If everyone links back, we we can all benefit from traffic from one another.
  5. You can submit up to three articles total.
  6. Posts can be old or new.
  7. You have until Tuesday, 13 September 2011 to submit.
  8. If you’d like to follow me, I certainly wouldn’t object! It’s not required, though.

Why should you participate?

  • We can all benefit from this!
  • Find new blogs and great writing advice—without sifting through the ENTIRE INTERNET.
  • Share the articles you’ve worked so hard on with my 200+ RSS subscribers.
  • It’s a great way to grow a blog!

How can I get a cool badge?
Copy the code below and paste it into a blog post or a gadget/widget in your sidebar. (It’s in HTML, so be sure you’re adding an HTML gadget, or select the Edit HTML/HTML tab above the text window on the edit post page.)

<a href="https://jordanmccollum.com/tag/writing-wednesday/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z41/MamaBlogga/th_writingwed.png" border="0" alt="Writing Wednesday" ></a>

Where do we put our links?
Right here! Please remember to link directly to your post (i.e. ihaveablog.blogspot.com/2011/05/i-have-a-post.html and NOT ihaveablog.blogspot.com—this makes it easier to find the article!) and use a descriptive name (i.e. How to handle backstory and NOT Yippity Skippity Blog!).

Just fill in the boxes below to get started:

Thanks for participating!

Photo: writing with my new pen by Melanie Cook

Have you ever considered . . . going to the other side?

Lately I’ve been toying with an idea in a genre I’d never wanted to write. One I came close to swearing I’d never bother with. But now I’m digging into the research, writing down ideas, and trying to develop an outline for this project.

In non fiction.

Weird, huh?

While the standards of good sentences and structure still apply at a high level, non fiction is such a different ballgame. I don’t know if I’m ready for this—or if I can go through with it.

What do you think? Would you ever write non fiction? What would be the biggest challenge for you in non-fiction?

Writing Wednesday IV

Welcome back to Writing Wednesday! I let it slip a couple weeks, but now we’re back and better than ever—seriously. Check out the change—now there’s a prize!

Since so many of us are writers, I know we all must read lots of writing blogs. So let’s share some of the great things we learn about writing through a fun new linkup! It’s like a blogfest, only easier!Writing Wednesday

Last time, we had two fantastic entries:

Share your best posts on writing today!

What are the rules?

  1. All articles must directly relate to writing. If you see something that makes you think of a writing principle, and you want to participate, I recommend you blog about your thoughts, and then submit your blog post.
  2. You should use a descriptive name so we all want to click on the article: Jordan McCollum wouldn’t be very enticing, but Doing Backstory Right would.
  3. Articles can come from your blog or someone else’s.
  4. If it’s your post, PLEASE link back to Writer Wednesday in the post so your visitors can join in the fun! (You can use the badge below—the code includes a link!)
  5. You can submit up to three articles total.
  6. Posts can be old or new.
  7. You have until Tuesday, 6 September 2011 to submit.
  8. If you’d like to follow me, I certainly wouldn’t object! It’s not required, though.

Why should you participate?

  • We can all benefit from this!
  • Find new blogs and great writing advice—without sifting through the ENTIRE INTERNET.
  • Share the articles you’ve worked so hard on with my 200+ RSS subscribers.
  • It’s a great way to grow a blog!

How can I get a cool badge?
Copy the code below and paste it into a blog post or a gadget/widget in your sidebar. (It’s in HTML, so be sure you’re adding an HTML gadget, or select the Edit HTML/HTML tab above the text window on the edit post page.)

<a href="https://jordanmccollum.com/tag/writing-wednesday/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z41/MamaBlogga/th_writingwed.png" border="0" alt="Writing Wednesday" ></a>

Where do we put our links?
Right here! Please remember to link directly to your post (i.e. ihaveablog.blogspot.com/2011/05/i-have-a-post.html and NOT ihaveablog.blogspot.com—this makes it easier to find the article!) and use a descriptive name (i.e. How to handle backstory and NOT Yippity Skippity Blog!).

Just fill in the boxes below to get started:

  • Jordan McCollum – Burying clues using context & interpretation
  • Noah – This Premise is alarmed
  • Margot Hovley–Perspective
  • James Duckett – 1 word vs 2 words
  • Daniel R. Marvello – The Beta Experiment – Week 3
  • Ronda Hinrichsen–A Suspense Block
  • Question Doc: Dealing with the questions that come up while writing
  • Ch-ch-ch-changes!
    I’m going to change two things for this link party. The first will be that the party will move from being held biweekly, to being held every Wednesday.

    And change #2 is a bit more exciting: How about a prize for one contributor? One link author, chosen at random (only links entered by their authors are eligible), will receive a $20 Amazon gift card! Winner to be announced next Writing Wednesday.

    Thanks for participating!

    Photo: writing with my new pen by Melanie Cook

    Building a mystery

    This entry is part 11 of 11 in the series Clues in non mysteries

    Writing Wednesday returns this . . . well, Wednesday!

    Feel free to enjoy this song (which my littlest sister would call “really old”) while you read. It’s stuck in my head anyway, if you couldn’t guess from the title.

    As we’re burying our clues it’s important to remember that mysteries are central to stories in every genre. As Nathan Bransford points out, mysteries are what keep us reading (emphasis mine):

    When it comes to crafting a mystery, I think sometimes aspiring authors get distracted by the bodies and murders and the actual plot mechanics of mysteries, and miss what really drives a great mystery.

    Mysteries are about people. And more specifically, they’re about people wanting something, whether it’s an object, person, or knowledge (see also: Do You Know What Your Characters Want?). The character wants the woman to fall in love with him or to catch the killer or find the truth about what happened. We keep reading to find out if they’re going to get it.

    Here comes the word math:

    A character’s desire + Consequences/stakes + Obstacles + Delay = Mystery

    Getting too caught up in the clues and how exactly to bury them isn’t something we need to worry about as we’re brainstorming, outlining, or even writing our first draft. (Unless, of course, you have a brilliant idea during any of those processes—then use it!) The fine work of layering in just enough but not too many clues requires practice, patience and critique partners.

    But beyond all that, we have to keep in mind that the real key to mystery, and to suspense in any story is to keep our readers guessing about whether the protagonist will get what s/he wants.

    This concludes our series on clues in non mysteries!

    What do you think? What are the most important elements of a mystery to you?

    Seeding clues

    This entry is part 10 of 11 in the series Clues in non mysteries

    I’ve been wanting to do this series for a while. As proof, when I saw this article on Story as Garden on Flogging the Quill five months ago, I saved it to use in this series.

    In it, Ray Rhamey describes the foreshadowing we’ve mentioned here like “seeds.” He gives a few good examples: setting up a wedding ring that will later save the protagonist’s life, or the massive fist of someone who’ll deliver the knockout punch later (and yes, both of those are literal). Seeding these dramatic turns takes them from the territory of “over the top surprise,” making the reader feel cheated, to the realm of flawless, almost magical storytelling—and, he points out, can help make seeming Deus ex machina plot twists feel, pardon the pun, organic.

    This applies across all genres, he says: “A mystery writer must, of course, plant clues—interesting how even the language for doing this kind of thing is from gardening—but the rest of us need to pay attention to our seeding as well, for both action and characterization.”

    But if you haven’t been leaving your clues all along, all is not lost! Ray points out that with computers, it’s really easy to go back and add little phrases, hints of backstory (or heck, even whole scenes and chapters) to build up to a new element you’ve decided to add. Here’s his example (emphasis mine):

    About a third of the way into a novel, the female protagonist needs to be pulled out of a suicidal dive caused by the tragic death of her once-in-a-lifetime love. She encounters a small boy who seems to suffer from autism. She is a healer, and is sympathetic, but his condition and innocence didn’t seem like motive enough to stir her from her depression.

    So what would? How about if the child reminded her in a specific, powerful way of the man she had loved and lost? So the author went back to the scene leading to her love’s death and gave him a “little-boy-lost” look that had always melted her heart. Then the narrative showed her seeing that same look in the eyes of the boy. That stimulus started her on the path of helping the child, which ultimately brought her back to emotional life. The phrase “little-boy-lost” was seeded in three places that added up to powerful motivation for her when the right time came. By the way, the seed had to be distinctive enough to be easily recalled when the time came; in this case, little-boy-lost not only fit unobtrusively the first time it was used, i.e., didn’t call attention to itself, it was distinct enough to remember later.

    So seed your novel with small things early on that grow to be significant.

    Check out the full article!

    What do you think? Do you “seed” your clues as you go, or “post seed,” adding them in behind you once you’re further along?

    Photo by Fras1977

    It’s okay to foreshadow

    This entry is part 9 of 11 in the series Clues in non mysteries

    Writing Wednesday will return next week!

    If one critique partner pegs the killer by page 30 and another says that the surprise reveal was unfulfilling because it wasn’t foreshadowed, which one is right? They both are, of course, because they can only describe their own experience with the book—but that doesn’t really help you, does it?

    Naturally, there are detriments to foreshadowing too heavily:

    (You only have to watch 15 seconds to get the message; you don’t have to actually learn the bball technique.)

    I watched a movie recently where every time a “little fact” was mentioned, I could see the plot twist they thought they were “foreshadowing.” (“I don’t swim,” says one character. I called it—she was going to fall out of the boat and the lead would have to save her. Took about 30 minutes to get there.) Maybe I’ve just seen too many movies and thought about these things too much, but total predictability is definitely not our goal as writers.

    Or, to go back to our basketball analogy:

    So, what’s the writing equivalent of a no-look pass? I don’t think a reader has to see a surprise coming. But I think that once the surprise is sprung, readers should be able to remember (ideally) or go back and find the clues you’ve been planted along the way.

    In The Plot Thickens, Noah Lukeman gives one example of setting up a surprise—specifically, a secret:

    For the secret to be used for suspenseful effect, we have to know there is a secret; Norman Bates’s mother is alluded to in shadowy fragments; in Casablanca Ilsa flat out reveals there is something she cannot tell Rick; in the whodunits, we know from the long looks the staff exchange with each other that someone is not saying something. (137)

    Conversely, some surprises don’t actually have to be heavily foreshadowed: if you really can’t foreshadow because none of the POV characters have enough information or interactions to come across those clues, for example.

    Again, predictability is not a virtue in most storytelling. It’s not a bad thing to surprise your readers. But it is a delicate balance with foreshadowing and betrayal. Make sure your readers have all the pieces your characters do—but beating your readers over the head with the coming surprise is a good way to ruin it.

    What do you think? What’s good foreshadowing for a surprise?

    A version of this post was first published on 16 Feb 2010 as part of the Tension, Suspense and Surprise series.

    The virtues(?) of surprise(!)

    This entry is part 8 of 11 in the series Clues in non mysteries

    There is a difference (or delicate balance) between suspense and surprise. As Alfred Hitchcock points out, we can either seed clues and create suspense, drawing our audience’s emotions out, or shoot for surprise, and go for a big but short-lived emotional bang from the audience. Hitchcock says that suspense is better—and he’s right for the most part—but surprises still play an important role in all fiction.

    Most of the time, surprises shouldn’t come out of left field from the other side of the Green Monster. As writers, it can be very gratifying to pull one over on your readers. But it’s even more gratifying if you’ve surprised them despite the foreshadowing and clues you’ve planted throughout your story. Without something the reader can go back through and identify as a clue (“Oh, man, I should have seen it coming!”), they’re likely to feel betrayed.

    The clues and foreshadowing can be a great tool to build an amorphous suspense. If you keep them vague but strong, that sense of foreboding will carry through your work, pulling the readers with it—and they’ll still be stunned when you pull off the big reveal.

    But I think the worst kind of surprise is when we base a surprise on something the point of view character already knows but hasn’t told the reader. To me, that’s basically lying—leading the reader to believe that we’ll all be together and we’ll tell the reader everything, but holding back the one thing that our character would know or think or realize that would make the experience complete for the reader.

    I don’t mean that we have to spell out everything the character knows the exact second he or she knows it—or have the characters spill their guts to one another. But if the main character has known the truth all along—or they came into the story knowing some arcane fact that’s going to solve the case—that’s the kind of surprise that’s going to ring false to a reader unless it’s supposed to be the point of the whole story (and even then . . . ouch).

    So how much foreshadowing is enough? It depends on how big the surprise is—and how central it is to the plot. (Helpful, I know.)

    What do you think? How have surprises you’ve read (or written) fallen flat?

    This post, with a different introduction, originally ran 15 February 2010 as part of the series on Tension, suspense and surprise.

    Photo by Benson Kua

    Burying clues using context and interpretation

    This entry is part 7 of 11 in the series Clues in non mysteries

    This technique is similar to using framing for burying clues, but distinct enough I think it warrants its own entry in the series.

    In this method, the clue really is in plain sight. No tricks to cover it up or conceal its importance—only its meaning. Using the viewpoint character’s perspective, we explain away the clue because we’re seeing it out of context. Perhaps the POV character isn’t hunting for clues right now, or maybe we’ve moved from the plot with the mystery into a subplot involving other characters—anything to move the POV character’s frame of mind somewhere else so that the clue doesn’t seem to bear any extra significance.

    To cite an example I gave in the comments of an Edittorrent discussion on burying clues (although this is a mystery, the concept applies across genres; emphasis added):

    Let’s say that your plot is structured so that the hero is a detective and there’s been a murder at our heroine’s office (her supervisor was killed [with a staple gun, which our heroine doesn’t know], and there’s an obvious suspect). In her free time, our heroine has been helping her best friend start her own cafe.

    Our heroine is helping to decorate the cafe (in her subplot). Her BFF asks her to hang the grapevine lattice on the ceiling, since she’s afraid of heights. The heroine takes the lattice and the staple gun up the ladder and obliges.

    But really, the BFF is avoiding the staple gun because she killed the coworker (insert motive here). But because we’re out of context, given a plausible alternate explanation, and not in an investigative POV (and note the BFF doesn’t mention the weapon of choice), it’s easy to dismiss it (as long as there’s a clear purpose in the scene, too).

    Plus, now the BFF can frame our heroine with her prints on the murder weapon.

    Jami Gold also gave a great example of a slightly different methodology for doing this in the comments. The POV character interprets the clues into a context that might make sense to them, but it’s not correct. The heroine thinks the hero’s giving her A Look because he doesn’t approve of the friends she’s going out with (or doesn’t care about her); the hero can’t believe she’s ditching him.

    What do you think? How do you use context and interpretation to bury clues?

    Photo by Scott Vandehey