Category Archives: Reading

My TBR (to be read) pile, my take on my favorite reads and more

TBR Tuesday: Dead Running by Cami Checketts

I don’t really do beach reads. I just keep reading at the beach. So on a recent family reunion to the beach, the Kindle got a little sandy 😉 .

First up, I read Dead Running by Cami Checketts.

Cassidy Christensen is running. Running from the mercenaries who killed her parents. Running from a scheming redhead intent on making her life miserable. Running from painful memories that sabotage her dreams of happiness. With two very tempting men competing for her attention, she hopes she’ll finally have someone to run to, but can she trust either of them? When secrets from her past threaten her family, Cassidy decides to stop running and fight for her future.

A light-hearted suspense with a side of PG-rated romance, Dead Running will have you lacing up your running shoes and impatiently waiting for the sequel.

I wholeheartedly agree with the last line of the summary: this is definitely a lighter suspense novel, though the suspense is still there. I thought the bad guys’ ultimate scheme was well done. I started to get a little annoyed at Cassidy for not being able to choose between the two men pursuing her—love triangles, blech—but I managed to forgive her because her voice is so much fun to read! I really missed it when we were in sections of the book not narrated by her. Those sections felt almost bland and distant.

Like Cassidy at the start of the book, I hate running. But following her journey throughout the novel made me believe I could run a marathon. (Almost thou persuadest me to be a runner…) We get into the technical side of running and marathon training without feeling like we’re reading a manual (though there is a little jargon—I’m the kind of reader who tends to gloss over that without being overly bothered, though).

Some elements of the plot might be a little unrealistic, but, hey, it’s fiction. It’s fun. Run with it 😉 .

I got this book during a free promo on Amazon.

Modern readers–stupid, impatient or fatigued?

Back in March, I came across an interesting discussion on reading the classics, and how it seems people today really struggle with said “classics.” (Sadly, I didn’t record where this discussion was. Brilliant. BAM! Thank you, Google and my memory!)

I’ve been thinking about the “classics” again recently. After (finally!) getting Netflix last month and (finally!) watching Sherlock, I decided to (finally!) try the actual stories by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Like many works in the (very late) Victorian period, they were originally serialized. I listened to a narration of the first chapter of “A Study in Scarlet” and decided . . .

Victorian times must have been very bleak indeed if that passed for entertainment, and anyone wanted to read on. The plot doesn’t start in the first chapter. It doesn’t start in the second chapter. (At that point, my drive ended, and I haven’t felt compelled to pick it up again. Also, my Kindle has gone missing, so I can’t read it anyway…)

Now, we’re all very quick to claim that modern readers are dumber than those in the original audiences of these stories, or that TV has rotted our brains, etc. etc. etc., but as I said in my comment on the original post, I wonder if there’s actually a different reader phenomenon going on.

I highly doubt that every person who doesn’t enjoy pages upon pages of description is stupid, attention deficient or illiterate. Perhaps, however, we’ve become accustomed to not just the speed, but the “density” of modern storytelling, wherein we can only include the things that are significant to the characters and story. Then, when we read a text with a bit more latitude (lassitude? 😉 ) in this regard, we exhaust ourselves trying to catalog all these little “clues” for later significance, when really they aren’t significant to the story as a whole (and perhaps not even particularly significant to the scene).

Or maybe I was right before: the nineteenth century was so bleak that reading a treatise on whaling passed for fun.

What do you think? Are modern readers stupid? Or smarter than we give them (us) credit for?

How to write discussion questions for your novel

A couple weeks ago, I got a phone call from my sister-in-law. Her book club read I, Spy (!), and they wondered if I could provide any discussion questions.

Questions?If you’ve never seen this before, sometimes a book will include five to ten questions at the end to prompt and guide discussions of the novel. Often you see these in general fiction aimed toward book clubs, like These is my Words and The Secret Life of Bees.

I’ve been to book club meetings where there’s kind of nothing to talk about but the facts of the book—and even those aren’t in debate—so I definitely understand the desire for that kind of help. Of course, I also could’ve used some help coming up with those questions 😉 .

I figured I wasn’t the only one, so I wrote up with some ideas on how to come up with discussion questions for your novel.

Think about your theme

I really hope you’ve done this before you published 😉 . Beyond the events of the plot, what is your book about? In reality, you probably have a major theme and some minor supporting themes. Maybe you’ve tapped into the power of because.

Contemplate your characters’ journeys

What do your characters learn along the way? How do they change and grow because of the events of the story?

Ponder the plot

Rehashing the events of a book does not a book club make. They’ve all read it. How else might the events play out? How did the plot events affect the characters, and the readers?

Consider your characters

What are their attributes and flaws? How are they like—or unlike—people around you? How do their flaws affect the story?

Now: talk about how that applies to the reader

Take those concepts you’ve brainstormed by looking at these areas, and start thinking about how they apply to your readers and their lives. What can they talk about? How can they relate?

Open-ended questions (how, why, etc.) are better at prompting discussion than questions that can be answered with a yes or no. Yes/no questions can build to bigger discussion questions, however.

If your book deals with forgiveness, perhaps you could include discussion points on how to forgive, why we forgive, what you can and can’t forgive other people for, etc. Ask if they’ve ever known someone like this character, or what aspects of themselves they saw in that character. After X event, Character Q feels like he’s been abandoned by his last hope. Have you ever felt that way?

My discussion questions

So here’s what I came up with!

  1. Talia has to keep a secret from the man she loves. Have you ever kept a secret from someone you love? How did that affect your relationship?
  2. Talia learns that love can be a source of strength. How has love made you stronger? How else has love changed you?
  3. Danny feels betrayed by Talia. How have you dealt with someone you love lying to you?
  4. After months of training in DC, and several months of more in-depth instruction far away from family and friends, CIA trainees are allowed to bring their closest family members for a family weekend. As part of the weekend, family members are loaded onto a bus for a tour of the Farm facility.

    One year, the instructor-turned-tour guide clapped his hands and welcomed the family members to the CIA.

    One woman leapt to her feet. (In some stories, she’s even holding a young child.) “The CIA?” she exclaimed. “My husband works for the CIA?!” Could you forgive someone for something like that?

  5. Elliott has a hard time keeping his work and family priorities straight. (Don’t we all?) What would your priority be in his situation? Could you balance better than he does?
  6. Talia is afraid of commitment partially because of her family history, especially her parents’ failed marriage. How have you seen the effects of relationships across generations?
  7. Do you think you would make a good spy? Why or why not?

What do you think? How have you or would you come up with discussion questions?

Photo credit: Valerie Everett

TBR Tuesday: What makes you put down a book?

Goodreads conducted some research with surveys, Listopia and even digging into members’ bookshelves and reviews to find out what makes you put a book down. Their results, in a pretty little infographic:

putbookdown

via Sarah LaPolla on Twitter

So, what makes you put a book down? For me, it’s usually my insane schedule!

TBR Tuesday: Confessions of a 16-Year-Old Virgin Lips by Cindy M. Hogan

I recently got the chance to read“First Kiss”, (99¢) episode one of Confessions of a 16-Year-Old Virgin Lips, a new serial by Cindy M. Hogan. I enjoyed Watched (free!) by Cindy and was excited to read the first episode of Confessions.

Like the heroine of Watched, Brooklyn prides herself on being almost sweet 16 and never been kissed. But can she keep her badge of honor?

VL. Virgin Lips. You may not have heard of it, but where I live, it’s a thing with a card, even if it is a figurative card. I was Brooklyn Hill, certified virgin lips, and I planned on clinging to that figurative card with all I had—while dating as many of the hottest guys at school as I could.

Maybe that’s a bit strange. I mean, what teenage girl isn’t interested in kissing? Locking lips definitely interested me, but the drama that came with it didn’t. No kissing, no drama. Simple.

But on my sixteenth birthday, on my first real date even, the drama found me. His name was Luke Graham—cute, funny, and bad news for the whole female race.

This book has a very fun voice, and many of the things she experiences take me right back to my own high school years. I was most impressed with the main character, Brooklyn. In some ways, she’s very mature for 16. When I was in high school, like Brooklyn, I lived a different standard than many of my friends, and ironically, I felt like I had a much better handle on what was up (of course, my friends weren’t just kissing).

While this book is a fun, quick read, it also helps to remind us that we all know in our hearts what’s right and what’s wrong, and we know when we need to listen to our intuition. Brooklyn doesn’t follow her intuition, and she pays for it.

I received a free copy of this book in exchange for a fair and honest review.

Music singles are to novellas and shorts as albums are to . . . ?

Hint: NOT novels.

But first! On Friday, I guest posted at Janice Hardy’s blog on Five steps to better character arcs! I was a little busy with the blogfest Friday—we had eight great entries in our blogfest! I’m happy to award an Amazon gift card to a participant, chosen at random, and that winner is . . .

MARSHA WARD!

On its face, the popular analogy seems apt. In the last decade, although albums are still popular, music has largely broken free of the “form” of the album, with the single coming to dominate. It appears the same revolution is coming in fiction, with novellas, short stories and other short works—even the pertinently named “Kindle Singles” program&madsh;gaining popularity all the time.

And of course that means novels will probably become as obsolete as albums have. I mean, who buys CDs these days? (Hint: people still buy print books. Not sure on CDs…)

This is where the analogy breaks down. A novel (from most authors) is not like an album of music (from most artists). For most artists, an album is a compilation of songs which may mostly or all also be released as singles. Most of the time, the singles aren’t necessarily thematically, stylistically or otherwise related. In fact, I’m sure some artists strive for a lot of variety on an album.

What’s the equivalent of an album of music in fiction, then? A compilation, an anthology or a short story cycle. It’s a collection of shorter works, which might be related through the same characters or themes or settings, but they might not.

How is a novel different?

A novel is more than just a collection of shorter works. A novel (we hope!) develops the characters and plots to a more complex level. Novels can have more depth in characterization, themes, subplots, and exploring all these elements.

If we want to shoehorn this into the music analogy, I’d probably have to say that artists who construct an album as a cohesive whole, rather than writing individual songs as separate works. (Artists like Pink Floyd spring to mind, as well as The Who’s rock operas.)

What do you think? Music singles : Kindle singles :: albums : ??

TBR Tuesday: The Light Between Oceans by ML Steadman

I read The Light Between Oceans by ML Steadman for a long-distance book club with my mom, sisters & best friend!

After four harrowing years on the Western Front, Tom Sherbourne returns to Australia and takes a job as the lighthouse keeper on Janus Rock, nearly half a day’s journey from the coast. To this isolated island, where the supply boat comes once a season, Tom brings a young, bold, and loving wife, Isabel. Years later, after two miscarriages and one stillbirth, the grieving Isabel hears a baby’s cries on the wind. A boat has washed up onshore carrying a dead man and a living baby.

Tom, who keeps meticulous records and whose moral principles have withstood a horrific war, wants to report the man and infant immediately. But Isabel insists the baby is a “gift from God,” and against Tom’s judgment, they claim her as their own and name her Lucy. When she is two, Tom and Isabel return to the mainland and are reminded that there are other people in the world. Their choice has devastated one of them.

SPOILER ALERT: that one other person so devastated by their choice is the baby’s surviving relative. (Um, duh.) You can see right away that this is leading up to an emotional trainwreck, right?

I liked the book: it was interesting and compelling. I enjoyed the writing and the imagery (though sometimes there were too many images too close together, too incongruous: let them breathe! Let them resonate! Sheesh), and I found the plot very interesting. I liked how the past influenced the present, and the reverberations of the war and the loss of children echoed through so many characters.

The book is (about 98%) a tragedy. I like tragedies. However, I’m not totally convinced this is a great tragedy. Take a Shakespearean tragedy: Hamlet shows us how he who hesitates is lost. Macbeth shows us the consequences of “vaulting ambition.” Romeo and Juliet shows us the folly of feuding.

And The Light Between Oceans? It might want to show us that honesty is the best policy (yay aphorisms), but I’m not quite sure it achieves that, since even the honest and innocent characters reap negative consequences as shown on the pages. So to me it felt like rather than reaching for some sort of overarching, universal truth, the novel seems to point toward only a specific solution for these particular characters in this particular situation.

To quote one Amazon reviewer:

I do not feel enlightened, or that I have understood a moral quandary any better. I just feel terribly sad about what happens to all the main characters . . .

According to Aristotle, the point of tragedy is catharsis, right? An emotional release and a lesson learned through vicarious pain, basically. But if the lesson isn’t learned, then is the tragedy working? What do you think?

TBR Tuesday: Dene Low Giveaway Winner

Thanks to everyone who entered the giveaway for one Kindle e-book by Dene Low last week as part of the INDIEpendence Day blogfest! Our winner is . . .

Elle Strauss!

Congratulations!

Can’t get enough free books? Linda Weaver Clarke interviewed me & is giving away a copy of I, Spy this week!

What books did you discover during the INDIEpendence Day Blogfest?