All posts by Jordan

Creating sympathetic characters

This entry is part 1 of 11 in the series Creating sympathetic characters

Once upon a time, I wrote a novel where the main character wasn’t likeable. Well, she was—I liked her. But the way I’d written her made her come off as disdainful and arrogant—not qualities I really meant for her personality to convey. So I read everything I could on sympathetic characters and tried very hard to fix her. (One critique partner was adamant that I had not, but no one else objected.)

What does it mean to have a “sympathetic” character? It means that the reader can relate to him/her. The reader feels the things s/he feels, and the reader understands the difficulties that character is going through. (It doesn’t always mean, however, that the reader likes the character, though that can be helpful.)

It often seems like sympathizing with main characters (who aren’t villains or anti-heroes, at least) is automatic—but anyone who’s ever written an unsympathetic character quickly learns that it’s not. Sometimes we writers think we’re doing something avant-garde by creating someone as alienated/sarcastic/cruel/apathetic/distant as a “real” person—but most of the time, we learn that this “cutting-edge” technique has been tried before. Without success.

I didn’t really think I was being avant-garde or even cool when I created my unsympathetic character—I accidentally focused too much on characteristics or behaviors that made my trying-to-keep-her-cool character all but condescending.

Months after all my research to fix her, all that information suddenly crystallized. There are only two things that make a character sympathetic: strength and struggles. The character must have both in some form.

So this month, we’re going to be talking about strength, struggles and sympathy for characters!

Photo credit—Michal Zacharzewski

Editing ambivalence

This month’s series will be on creating sympathetic characters! But that’s for tomorrow.

I love editing. I love eradicating errors (where did all those typos come from?!); I love finding better, more vivid ways to say things; I love rewriting scenes on the whim of inspiration for something that is much, much better.

On the other hand, I hate editing. I hate slogging through my book for the third fifth eighth time only to discover that it’s still not perfect; I hate feeling that I don’t know whether this latest change is any better than the last three versions of this sentence; I hate getting directly contradictory opinions over something I’m torn about myself.

This is the definition of ambivalence. (Go ahead, look it up—ambivalence means feeling strongly both ways about something, although the common misusage has naturally bullied its way in to many a dictionary. Ambi in Latin means ‘both’—like ambidextrous—and valence comes from the Latin verb meaning ‘to be strong’—the same root as valiant, for example.)

These days, however, my scale is starting to tip towards hate more and more. I think I’m burning out on my latest round of revisions. This will be my third round in two months, so I suppose fatigue is only understandable. But I haven’t written anything new in almost as long (aside from new/rewritten scenes), and that’s something that I really need to do.

Unfortunately, none of my many ideas is screaming “write me now!!!” at the moment. But rather than run myself ragged on revisions, I think I’m going to try to start on another book—just the first three chapters. The big risk here is that if my idea isn’t really ready, writing is like wringing blood from a stone—it’s just as tiring as another round of revisions.

Do you have a love/hate relationship with editing? How do you avoid editing burn out?

Photo credit—Book heart: Piotr Bizior; screaming: ralaenin

The lesser of two evils: weak verb or adverb use?

I have a problem with smiling. And nodding.

enigmatic smileThee problem is this: there’s only a handful of words in the English language to express those actions: smile, beam, grin, smirk, simper. Nodding is even worse: nod. Other versions of this one tend to draw attention to the words instead of showing the characters’ actions: bobbed his head (“up and down,” if you want to make it even more annoying).

But the real problem here is that every smile and every nod don’t look like or mean the same thing. There are sinister smiles, eager grins, coy smiles, small smiles, half smiles, half smirks. There are greeting nods, indicating nods, assenting nods, effusive nods, reluctant nods, slow nods, quick nods.

Obviously my problem is not identifying the kinds of smiles and nods humans use. My problem comes from describing them in writing, because that’s against the rules. There are a lot of so-called rules in writing. As with anything with a body of ad hoc regulations, many of the rules contradict each other. Like these:

1. Never use adverbs. Ever! (Corollary: adjectives are bad; they are trouble!)

and

2. Always use strong verbs. Until you make yourself, your characters and your readers tired!

(We’ll talk more about Rule #1 another day.)

When do they conflict? I’ll show you. Consider:

He gave her a kind smile OR He smiled at her kindly

He shot her a bemused look OR He looked at her bemusedly

He gave his thumb a pensive chew (LOL) OR He chewed his thumb pensively

mmm lunchAnd do they need the forbidden modifier? I think so. Can you infer the meaning of his grin with just “He smiled at her”? (I have two images in mind here: “He smiled at her. Mmm. Lunch.” and “He smiled at her. Oh, a friend.”) A thumb chewer may be a small child seeking comfort, an adult pondering a problem or a guy with a nervous habit.

Now, of course, there are lots of other ways to show the intent behind nods and smiles. But setting aside all of the myriad other possible constructions, what do you think: which of the above contrasts are better? Which is the lesser of two evils?

Photo credits—Mona Lisa: Songkran; Jack-o-lantern: Joanie Cahill

Why I love blogging

The wonderful Annette Lyon is out to give me a heart attack. First, she goes and in the middle of celebrating the release of her new grammar book, There, Their, They’re, she up and links to me and goes on and on about my Word Nerdiness (and yes, that’s a compliment). And then last week, she does it again, this time passing along an award to boot.

And before I get off on that tangent, I pull up her blog this week and see a freaking huge picture of ME on the top post. If ever you want to know how and why we became friends (and/or are secretly separated at birth), Annette lays it all out there. Plus, she wrote a wonderful guest post this week on verbs in dialogue tags—the exact topic I was just about to suggest to her when she told me that was what she was thinking of writing about. Yep, separated at birth.

So, anyway, she gave me an award, too. As if the whole “This is your life” game wasn’t enough 😉 .

Here’s the purpose and instructions for the NENO’S Award:

*a dedication for those who love blogging and love to encourage friendships through blogging.
* to seek the reasons why we all love blogging.
* put the award in one post as soon as you receive it.
* don’t forget to mention the person who gives you the award.
* answer the award’s question by writing the reason why you love blogging.
* tag and distribute the award to as many people as you like.
* don’t forget to notify the award recipients and put their links in your post.

Thank you, Annette! I’m flattered 😀 . (Despite the repeated attempts on my life. How come you save Tristi but try to kill me??)

Why I love blogging
There are a lot of things I love about blogging. At my work blog, Marketing Pilgrim, I like the opportunity to analyze the Internet marketing industry from time to time, as well as the chance to keep my editing skills sharp. At my blog about fulfillment in motherhood, MamaBlogga, I love building friendships with other moms, and taking the time to pause and appreciate being a mother, but most of all I love it when someone tells me I’ve made a difference for them that day.

Here on my writing blog, I like developing friendships with other writers and the chance to air my thoughts instead of sitting here fuming over yet another book/website/blog post that claims any use of “was [verb]ing” is passive voice. I’m looking forward to being able to discuss mechanics and technique and books and hearing your insightful comments.

Sharing the love
Kaye Dacus, whose blog was one of the first writing craft blogs I’d ever come across—and I love it as much today as I did then.

My Romance with Romance by my critique partner, Marnee, who (no matter what she may modestly claim) has taught me so much about writing romance. Just look how great Marnee is!

Tristi Pinkston, whom I got to meet last weekend at the launch for her newest book, Agent in Old Lace (read my review), and who is just the kindest, most inspiring mother, writer and mother-writer. Plus she has the best book promo/blog scavenger hunt ever.

Traci Hunter Abramson, who was awesome and really encouraging to me. Plus, I’ve read all of her books (though Lockdown is still waiting for me on my counter).

Thanks again, Annette!

Agent in Old Lace by Tristi Pinkston – Review

Okay, okay, I’ll confess—I tend to pick up books on subjects I’m interested in. Surprise, surprise. So when I saw that Tristi Pinkston had a book with an undercover FBI agent, I knew I had to get Agent in Old Lace.

When Shannon survives her boyfriend’s attempt on her life, she has to testify against her would-be killer. But he escapes custody and Shannon is in danger again. So naturally, the FBI assigns her a live-in bodyguard—one who’s tall, dark and handsome, despite the wig and the skirt. Can (very) Special Agent Rick Holden fight her attacker and his feelings for her?

I read this book in (basically) a single sitting. (If you don’t count stopping to make dinner, take a walk and put the kids to bed.) When I reached the climax, I was racing to find out what happened next! While you know who the bad guy is from page three, there’s lots to keep you guessing—and I totally guessed right 😉 . I love a book that makes me feel like a good detective (or just someone who’s seen too many episodes of Law & Order).

As always, I have to make note of any cons for the book—to me, sometimes it felt like the POV could have been a little deeper. I’m not really sure why, but sometimes the action just felt a little distant for me. However, I know other people haven’t had this problem, and it wasn’t an issue at the climax.

Tristi also deserves kudos for the best book promo/blog contest I’ve seen . . . pretty much ever. It’s kind of a blog scavenger hunt mixed with a little detective work—and it’s a lot of fun!

My Summer Reading Thing

LDS Fiction is running the annual Summer Reading Thing again this year! From June 1 to August 31, participants read fiction by LDS authors and post reviews. Since I was already doing the reviews, I thought it’d be good to jump in, since there’s a chance to win a fabulous prize. Id est, more books 😀 .

So I glanced over at my To Be Read pile and listed out the books sitting there waiting for me (yeah, there are other books in the pile, but they’re not by LDS authors).


Lockdown by Traci Hunter Abramson: Lockdown review

All’s Fair
by Julie Coulter Bellon: All’s Fair review

Contentment – Inspiring Insights for LDS Mothers by Maria Covey Cole (not fiction, but still on my list).

Having Hope by Terri Ferran: Having Hope review

Spires of Stone by Annette Lyon: Spires of Stone review

Tower of Strength by Annette Lyon: Tower of Strength review

Agent in Old Lace by Tristi Pinkston: Agent in Old Lace review

Recovering Charles by Jason F. Wright Recovering Charles review

Fool Me Twice
by Stephanie Black: Fool Me Twice review

Catholic roots, Mormon Harvest
by Eric Shuster (again, I know it’s nonfiction.
Methods coversmall
Methods of Madness
by Stephanie Black Methods of Madness review
mynotsocover
My Not-So-Fairy-Tale Life
by Julie Wright My Not-So-Fairy-Tale Life review

When to follow the verb rules

There’s a time and a place for everything, naturally, and while I love to talk about flouting stupid rules, most of the rules are actually good advice that’s just a bit . . . misapplied. As Mr Knightley says:

Better be without sense than misapply it as you do.

Right! So, let us understand the so-called rules so that we can apply them correctly, shall we?

Avoid passive voice
This is almost always good advice. Generally speaking, passive voice is awkward. Naturally, there are exceptions to that—sometimes rephrasing the passive into active voice is even more awkward, sometimes we have to conceal the actor, sometimes it’s just not important.

Avoid the past progressive
In general, the past progressive form (was [verb]ing) isn’t the strongest. (How’s that for diplomacy?) There are a few specific reasons to use it—mostly to show an ongoing or interrupted action in the past. Overusing it, though, results in flabby writing.

Avoid the verb “to be”
It’s true that sometimes the verb “to be” can be used to make such evils as the passive voice, the past progressive, and really boring, flat writing. Compare, too:

The stockings were hung by the chimney.
The stockings hung by the chimney.

The first one is passive voice (and The Night Before Christmas, yes?), longer and takes the oomph out a verb. (‘Hang’ isn’t very oomphy in the first place, so let’s try to help it out, eh?)

However, again, “to be” is an important verb that you don’t want to completely excise from your writing—or it’s gonna get really weird.

What other rules do we see that are pretty good advice?

Ghost of a Chance by Kerry Blair – Review

I had the pleasure of meeting Kerry Blair at the LDStorymakers Conference last month. She was wonderful and kind and gracious even before I mentioned the fact that I’d just bought Ghost of a Chance, but hadn’t read it yet. She joked that if I didn’t like it, she’d be happy to refund the 50¢ she got as royalties. Her friend, Deb, also at our table, handed me two quarters and told me to say I loved it.

So yes, I have been compensated for this review. And yes, I did enjoy this book. I picked it up because . . . well, have you seen my latest projects? I’m just a little interested in Catholic things these days and part of this mystery is set in a crumbling Catholic mission.

But I’ll tell you right now—once you open this book, the Catholic angle isn’t what keeps you reading. The best thing about this book, hands down, is the voice. The protagonist, Samantha Shade, is absolutely hilarious—she’s witty, funny and as devoted to parentheticals as I am. While it always takes me a little while to get used to first-person narrators, since they’re not the default these days, once I was used to it (within the first chapter or so), I was hooked—and the book would not have been the same without it. When it comes down to it, whether you relate to that voice will determine whether you like the book.

This book also gets genuinely oh-crap-it’s-one-AM-and-I-need-sleep-but-I-can’t-stop-after-reading-that creepy. Yet it’s still very funny and very light in many ways because of the narrator.

Let’s see, the cons. I kind of felt like we lost the hero, Det. Thom Casey, for a while while he was off solving the crime and collecting the necessary info to save the day. And of course, a lot of it is over the top, but it’s played for humor and with the narration style, it all works. A very fun read!