All posts by Jordan

Lucky! Number! Seven!

This entry is part 8 of 13 in the series All my novels

After a maaajor crash and burn novel, I needed to quit writing, perhaps forever. And then fall (the season) came, and with it, NaNoWriMo—National Novel Writing Month.

To this point, I’d never done a full NaNo. I made a sad attempt in 2006, but stalled out in the first chapter. In 2010, the year before this, I did a “Half-No” where I added 25,000 words to my ill-fated sixth novel. I’d written a book pretty quickly before: 90,000 words in 8 or 9 weeks, spanning over November (2008), but I started in October (five years ago today, in fact!), so it couldn’t count as official even if my word count was enough.

I like to challenge myself, so doing NaNo wasn’t enough. I heard of Candace Havens’s “Fast Draft” method, where you write your first draft in two weeks. I finally found the right characters to use for an idea that had been bouncing around in my brain for over a year, sketched out a plot, threw that away, took a deep breath, crossed my fingers, and dove in.

The book stats

Title: Bloodstone
Genre: Uhh . . . action/adventure romance, I guess? It’s a lot like National Treasure.
Inspiration: Umm . . . I think it was partially inspired by a History Channel pseudoscientific special on Vikings in the Americas. Also, some notes on a passage of scripture.
Writing dates: 1 November 2011 – 14 November 2011
Length: Just over 78,000 in the first draft; sitting at 85,000 right now.
Elevator pitch (or a little bit longer than that): Professor Cora Warren has an archaeological dig to conduct; her student Jack has his own agenda: an unbelievable archaeological theory. But it’s not his theory that challenges Cora’s faith the most—until they unearth an artifact that will drag them through a thousand years of incredible history, give them both a reason to believe, and bring them face-to-face with a secret society hellbent on keeping the treasure and the glory for themselves.

Dude. I love this book.

107/365 [Flying Fingers]

What I learned from this book

First and foremost: as soon as I got up on November 1, I dove into this book. AND WRITING WAS FUN AGAIN! It had been two years since I’d written something that I loved and enjoyed, and had it flow. I’d forgotten the joy of drafting, and how much my soul needed that creative energy. I also got to revisit one of my favorite conflicts in romance: forbidden love!

To date, this is the longest I’ve gone from initial idea to actual writing. In fact, I was sure I’d given up on that idea, that it didn’t have the spark or passion I’d need to sustain a novel. The characters I’d initially sketched out for the idea just didn’t connect with me: the “hero” had such an obvious agenda he came off as flat before I ever even gave the guy a name. Having let the ideas percolate so much—and building on something that has as much background as Vikings in America—gave me a lot of fuel to write very fast!

And speaking of writing fast, I wrote real fast. I wasn’t sure if I could really do the Fast Draft method, especially since I don’t write on Sundays, but sure enough, I hit “The End” on November 14, averaging 6500 words a day. This was majorly helped by my first ever writing retreat, where I wrote . . . darn, my records are on my old laptop still. But it was many words. Plus, I got to be there to receive the acceptance letter for what was to be my first published novel (third manuscript), and to get to share that news with friends in person was very cool. (There may have been a request for a cartwheel. I may have fulfilled that request.)

Writing fast also had some other advantages. I thought I’d end up with a super sloppy first draft, and yes, in some ways I did. However, having the entire novel in my head helped me to weave together threads that I probably wouldn’t have seen otherwise, instead of dropping them and fixing it in revision. It really felt like weaving a novel, like all the craft and structure mechanics I’d spent the last four years beating into my head were really coming together. It was far from perfect—and I think it’s going to have to undergo a second round of revisions still—but it was surprisingly good.

COVEROne of the craft and structure mechanics that really came together for me during this time was the concept of the character arc, and most especially how I needed to use that arc at the climax. This was a major craft breakthrough for me, and I’m excited to share it with you in Character Arcs, coming next week! (You can add it to your Goodreads now. Just sayin’.)

This novel was also the first time I got to experiment with different timelines, something I love to read. I watched National Treasure to analyze the structure of the genre and I was struck that the beginning of the movie is a flashback (uh, sort of?) depicting part of the history of the secret/legend they’re pursuing. I ended up using three storylines throughout: one in Puritan times (the first time the stone is unearthed), one in the mid-nineteenth century (forming the secret society), and one modern (finding stone, coming up against secret society, romance, character arcs and more). Plus a scene in Viking times (remembering the creation of one of the clues).

Man. I love this book. I’m going to love it so much more when it’s shiny and perfect. Sigh.

Tell me about one of your favorite manuscripts!

Photo credit: The Hamster Factor via Flickr & CC

Win a Kindle Fire & fill it with great books, free & on sale!

You guys, I have so much awesome news.

First and foremost, I’m guest posting today at the new home of the Bookshelf Muse, Writers Helping Writers! Come learn how to turn your character’s strength into a weakness to create a character arc! Also, check out the post to find out when Character Arcs is coming out, gear up for their Amazing Race and the debuts of the Positive Traits Thesaurus and the Negative Traits Thesaurus

Second, we have the winners of the review contest. The Grand Prize winner, drawn at random is . . . comment #8! MINDY HOLT! You’ll get the $25 Amazon Gift Card as well as ARCs of Spy for a Spy and Character Arcs. Also, Lindzee Armstrong gets ARCs of Spy for a Spy and Character Arcs!

Okay, third, and getting back to what I promised you in the title of this post, I’m part of a huge promotion today and tomorrow. You can enter to win a 7″ Kindle Fire giveaway (scroll down), and find over 50 free or sale-priced books to fill it!

bookmark

Check out Bookmarked Bargains to find them all!

There’s more good news to share but . . . this is so much that I think we’ll spread out the happy. We deserve more happy days, right?

TBR Tuesday: Blog This by Cami Checketts (& free reads!)

Today we’re celebrating the release of Blog This by Cami Checketts!


Will protecting children throughout the world cost Natasha her own family?

Devastated by the loss of her brother, Natasha Senecot works to expose the dangers of Matthew Chrysler’s violent video games, succeeding in bankrupting and humiliating him.

Chrysler retaliates and sends a hit man after her. Natasha is forced to fake her own death to protect her children, but after witnessing another tragedy, Natasha won’t hide any longer.

In a race against time, can Natasha expose Matthew Chrysler before his assassin murders her family and shatters her world?

Celebrating her release, the author is also offering her other books on sale through October 18th!

FREE!
FREE!
Poison Me Dead Running

 

Starting tomorrow, October 16, through October 18th

99¢
99¢
The Broken Path Blog This

My review

I read Dead Running over the summer and really enjoyed Ms. Checketts’s blend of humor, romance and suspense. She hits all the right notes again with Blog This! At first I wasn’t sure which romantic lead we were supposed to be rooting for, but pretty soon it was obvious there was only one viable option, though there were some very big, very real obstacles to overcome. A couple times I wanted to shake the main character, but Ms. Checketts did a really great job of making even kind of annoying or outright evil characters sympathetic. A fun read!

I received a free e-copy of the book from the author in exchange for an honest review.

The year I quit

This entry is part 7 of 13 in the series All my novels

Have you entered the contest to win a $25 gift card &
free books yet
?

After my fifth novel, I took a break. Which ended up being a lot longer than I’d planned. I got a rejection back for novel #3 and set about revising and rewriting it. The first chapter went on to win a contest to get fast tracked in the submission pile at several publishers, but then I got my teeth kicked in and sent it through three more rounds of readers and revisions.

"Journal of Universal Rejection" coffee mugAs you can imagine, the constant revising and rewriting drove me nuts. I’ve never been one to make sweeping changes based on one reader’s feedback, always waiting for consensus, consulting with people I trust, weighing out the options, but there was a ridiculous amount of work put into the revisions.

Meanwhile, I went and had a baby (my third). Frankly, that pregnancy was a very difficult time for me, but that’s a whole other post. On top of all that, I had no new projects for nearly a year. I wanted to move a bit slower—I was tired after writing three manuscripts in a year, and I knew it would be difficult to get back into writing until the baby was a bit older. I made it three or four months before I just had to write again.

The book stats

Title: Façade
Genre: Historical romantic suspense
Inspiration: a what-if question based on a commercial for a new TV series
Writing dates: September-ish 2010 – February-ish 2011.
Length: Right around 68,000
Elevator pitch: A female Soviet diplomat and an American spy must work together in post-war Paris to save the peace treaty negotiations—and her father—to forestall another world war.

What I learned from writing this book

I learned that I can still write! Or . . . not. I started with an idea I loved (still do), but I could tell the style was going to be more demanding than my previous, more conversational novels. Read: I wanted this to be more literary. That put a lot of pressure on me, so I set a goal quite low, probably 500 words a day. I didn’t want to pin myself down to too rigid of an outline. I needed to let this book take its own course and its own time, I thought.

This was my first novel since the very first to be written in first person. In fact, I did more than one first person narrator, and even added in sections with a third-person present narrator to heighten the tension but . . . this book just never worked. The longer that booked dragged out, the worse it got. I did a “Half-No” in November to add 25,000 words to it, and then I think we limped along until about February to get to its final word count.

I tried. Again and again I tried. I scrapped the middle section and tried to rewrite it. But every time I came up against a wall. To this day, I still don’t know what to do with that middle section. I really like the first couple chapters. I really like the last third or so. I really don’t know how to get from A to B. That’s a major blow to a writer’s confidence: after writing several books that did work, I somehow thought I knew what I was doing.

You never really know what you’re doing.

I still submitted the first couple chapters to contests, and at first I did well: first place. The highest score in another contest, out of all entries in all categories in the first round—in fact, out of 334 points, I got 332.

But then the final round judge, an editor at a major house, read my first few chapters and synopsis and really didn’t like them. She used an exclamation point to express how bad they were and placed my entry dead last. (It really didn’t feel like an “honorable” mention.) I pitched the book to an editor at a different house, and she was very nice and encouraging, but wasn’t interested. She offered to recommend some agents for the book; her assistant never returned my email.

Once again, I was left with a single foundering project. My other book was out on submission, but . . . I was so done. I wasn’t even sure I would be interested in accepting an offer at that point.

Then something happened to our family that only happens on television. Again, this is a whole ‘nother post, but a particularly unexpected death took place in my extended family. With that kind of suffering in the world—with the people I’ve known and loved all my life—I couldn’t face made up people and their problems.

It came down to this, I realized one day walking out of the library: I started writing because it made me happy. It wasn’t making me happy anymore. At all. So I gave myself permission, and I quit. Perhaps forever. But at least through the end of summer 2011.

this is what I am doing!

I don’t know if I’d take back any book I’ve written, but if I could forget a year in my writing career, October 2010 to October 2011 would probably be it.

Have you ever quit writing?

Photo credits: Journal of Universal Rejection mug—Tilemahos Efthimiadis; quit button—Tizzie, both via Flickr & CC

NaNoWriMo is (almost) upon us!

There’s still time to prepare!

Anybody else getting anxious for November? I know I am. I’m so excited I have to DO something, so I’m brainstorming scenes for my book:

SAMSUNG

In addition to the #Plot101 Twitter event (still going strong!)(explanation here), I’m also lurking around the forums of the NaNoWriMo site. Feel free to add me as a writing buddy. You might be able to find me under the nano-2013-Participant-Vertical-Bannerenigmatic name of JordanMcCollum. That 0 word count is bugging me…..

As I’ve worked on all these things, I’ve had to review all my favorite plotting methods and character posts—on others’ blogs, and on my own. So if you’re getting ready for NaNoWriMo, here are some writing resources on my site that I’ve been thinking about and studying, and I hope they might help you prepare, too.

The plot thickens, my series on plotting, highlights plot structures and methods including the three act structure, Larry Brooks’s story structure, the Snowflake method, the Hero’s Journey, and now Blake Snyder’s Save the Cat (also available as a PDF, but it hasn’t been updated to include the Save the Cat posts).

Creating sympathetic characters—while you can edit a great deal of sympathy into your characters, keeping these things in mind as you write can help you get it right the first time.

Backstory—figuring out your character’s life story, what to leave out, and where to start your story.

Tension, Suspense and Surprise—vital elements (I mean, these things often keep me going through a first draft!), though they can be a bit tougher to get right on the first try.

And, depending on how you write, you might be able to try out some new techniques with Deep POV or dialogue—or save those for editing.

Are you NaNoing? What are you doing to prepare?

Updated from Nano 2011 & 2012

Save our subplots: Making subplots indispensable

This entry is part 6 of 7 in the series Subplots

When you just can’t let go

We’ve all been there—a character, a scene, or an entire subplot that we know isn’t really vital to our story. We need to cut it. But we . . . can’t.

Good news: you may not have to. It will be a lot more work, but if that extraneous subplot is something you truly love, you can make it work in your story.

SOS

Purposes of the elements of fiction

If we really have to keep a subplot, what do we do to make that subplot matter? Like the larger and smaller units of fiction, subplots must serve a purpose. For example, on the Writing on the Wall blog, author Annette Lyon lists six of the most basic purposes of a scene:

  1. Advance the plot
  2. Create or show conflict
  3. Set the setting
  4. Reveal character
  5. Show backstory
  6. Lay groundwork for later plot

The purposes are the same or similar for subplots. Numbers 1 and 2 on this list are probably the most important in any sort of commercial or popular fiction. In fact, Annette says that most of your scenes should have #1 or #2 as a purpose—in addition to one of the other six.

If nearly every scene should advance the plot and/or create/show conflict, in addition to developing another aspect of the story, we should strive to accomplish that in our subplots and their scenes as well. A subplot just for character development isn’t enough of a purpose.

Making subplots matter

When you truly cannot cut the subplot, what do you do? You make the subplot matter.

First of all, look at the list of subplot purposes above (and add to it if you really need to). How can you add those purposes to your subplot?

When I’m trying to make a scene matter, I ask myself these questions:

  • What is the character’s goal for this scene?
  • How can things get worse?
  • How can I raise the stakes?
  • What is the source of conflict in this subplot and how can I make the conflict bigger?
  • What is going on in the scenes surrounding each subplot scene, and how can the subplot affect and interact with those scenes?
  • How can I weave in the antagonist, the plot, or a character turning point?

The final point here is the one that I’ve used the most. With all these questions, we want to look for ways to better tie the subplot into the central story and characters. Incorporate the themes or the character arc more, heighten the conflict and the suspense, affect the trajectory of the main plot, etc.

How I’ve done this

Yep, I’ve been there done that!

When I was rewriting the book that will be my first published novel, I knew I needed to amp up the mystery plot (and tone down the romance plot a bit). So I went through each scene, specifically looking for a way I could increase the tension and suspense, raise the stakes and bring in the antagonists more.

Where could I tie in the antagonists? Could they appear in more scenes? Could they make more threats? Could they be watching, waiting, this whole time? What are they doing? How does that affect my main characters’ thoughts and actions? You may need to edit scenes that aren’t currently involved in the subplot to add these characters or ideas in, or you might have to write entire new scenes.

For another example, a couple years ago I pulled out a book I’d written almost 3 years before, ready to revise. I’ve already edited it a bit, so just about all of the scenes are in there for a good reason (though I can see I hadn’t really grasped scene goals at the time). However, some sections of the book really dragged, so I brainstormed how to draw in the antagonist more, how to keep the threat present and how to raise the stakes.

In this particular book, I decided that showing the villains’ subplot through their POV was the perfect solution. Whenever the main characters’ story began to turn more toward the internal, emotional side (and the external threat waned), I showed the villains working toward their objectives, reminding the reader that they were still there.

If you’re making substantial changes to a subplot or secondary character, be sure to reread the scenes involved (and any changed or new ones). Make sure the edits still track with each other as well as the story as a whole.

What do you think? How else can you make your subplots matter?

Photo credits: SOS—Carlos Rosas; question mark—Alexander Drachmann, both via Flickr & CC

Subplot caveats

This entry is part 5 of 7 in the series Subplots

Subplots can be tricky little devils, eh? If you’ve already determined your subplots are definitely necessary (or you made them that indispensable) and they’re not trying to take over your story, here are a few things to look out for when using a subplot.

subplots series. Photo by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Mirroring subplots

When using a subplot to mirror the main character’s journey, one danger is to make the subplot superfluous by too closely mirroring the main plot. A second identical plot doesn’t add anything to the book.

Fix it: Brainstorm ways to differentiate the plots, such as:

  • How can I show something unique about the main/secondary character through this subplot?
  • How can I refine or clarify the main plot/theme through this subplot?
  • How can I foreshadow the main plot without giving it away in this subplot?

With mirroring subplots, however, it’s also possible to go too far the other direction. Remember that the purpose of a mirroring subplot is to reinforce a part of the main story: the character’s internal journey, the external plot, characterization, etc. If we mirror that piece of the main story, but cast it in a contradictory light, we’re undercutting our main story instead of reinforcing it.

For example, if we’re mirroring the main character’s arc, but the secondary character does the “wrong” thing, refuses to grow, we can’t reward them by giving them what they want. That doesn’t show the main character that their path to growth is a good thing!

Contrasting subplots

A contrasting subplot shows the opposite sort of progress, growth or change as the main plot—for example, a secondary character exhibits the same weakness as the main character, but refuses to go on a journey to growth like the main character does.

To make sure this works in your subplot, be sure that:

  • The secondary character’s weakness is the same as or highly similar to the main character’s.
  • The secondary character does not go on a journey to growth, despite having the same opportunity.
  • When the secondary character refuses to grow, she reaps negative consequences.
  • The ultimate outcome for the character is negative.

This way the contrasting subplot reinforces the character’s arc.

Complicating subplots

When your subplot is affecting the main character, but the secondary characters aren’t growing or changing, you may have a complicating subplot. Personally, I’d double check to make sure you really want a complicating subplot rather than a mirroring or contrasting one, since those add extra depth.

One of the major dangers of complicating subplots is appearing superfluous. Make sure that your characters really affect the main plot and main characters, and nothing else could do the same job.

Conversely, you could be making your secondary characters or subplot work too hard—if they’re the only thing that propels the main plot or the main character, that could indicate a proactivity problem with the main parts of your book.

Meddling secondary characters are great for creating conflict in a book. But if your secondary characters are coming out of the woodwork to resolve all the main characters’ problems—without the protagonists really working for them—it feels like the main character is relying on a deus ex machina for resolution, rather than learning, growing and becoming a stronger person. And which of those would you rather read?

What are other common dangers of subplots?

Photo credit: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Win a $25 Amazon gift card and ARCs!

Who doesn’t like free books and book money?! Here’s your chance to win both!

The prizes

Grand Prize

$25 gift card to Amazon.com
(not actually in a box)
SpyForSpy_CVR_LRG
Advance Reader Copy of
Spy for a Spy

(Print!)
character arcs V2
Advance Reader Copy of
Character Arcs

(e-book)

Other prizes:
SpyForSpy_CVR_LRG
Advance reader e-copy of Spy for a Spy

character arcs V2
Advance reader e-copy of Character Arcs

Exact number of prizes awarded will depend on the number of entries received—so enter lots!

How to enter

Step 1: Read I, Spy (and/or Mr. Nice Spy). This is kind of important to do step 2.

Step 2: Review I, Spy (and/or Mr. Nice Spy). You can leave a review on Amazon, Kobo, Barnes & Noble, Smashwords*, and/or Goodreads.

(Mr. Nice Spy links: Amazon, Kobo, Barnes & Noble, Smashwords*, and/or Goodreads.)

Step 3: Leave a comment here with a link to your review. You can enter more than one review (i.e. different books or different sites), but YOU MUST LEAVE EACH LINK IN ITS OWN COMMENT FOR IT TO COUNT AS A SEPARATE ENTRY IN THE RANDOM DRAWING!! Please try to use the direct link to your review and not just the review page so I don’t have to go hunting for it. Thanks 🙂 .

Step 4: Check back here on Thursday, October 17, to find out if you’ve won!

Rules, Questions and Details

Entries (comments) must be received by Wednesday, 16 October, 2013, 11:59:59 PM MDT.

Winner(s) will be drawn at random from the comments. If you want to enter more than once with separate reviews, use ONE SEPARATE COMMENT for EACH review link. Do not put three links in one comment. Comment three times. This makes my life easier. And I need that.

Again, how this works: say you review I, Spy on Amazon and Goodreads, and Mr. Nice Spy on Amazon and Goodreads. Come leave four comments here, one with the I, Spy Amazon review link, one with I, Spy Goodreads review link, one with the MNS Amazon review link and one with the MNS Goodreads review link. FOUR SEPARATE COMMENTS = four entries! (One comment with four links = 1 entry.) One entry link per comment, one comment per entry link.

More entries = more prizes! I’m not pinning myself down to something in case you guys surprise me and I get really generous. Even if that doesn’t happen, the chance of winning will most likely be pretty dang good. You should go for it.

Do the reviews have to be positive? No. But do you really want to hurt me? Do you really want to make me cry?

Can I enter if I won/received a free copy of the book? Yep.

Can I enter with a review I’ve already posted? Yep.

Can I enter if we’re friends or family? Yep. Don’t know if I’ll let you win, family member, but you can sure enter!

Winners will be announced on the blog, and maybe even contacted by email. Open worldwide. Void where prohibited. Awesome on all continents. And in the oceans, too. Seas. Islands—okay, the whole planet.

So enter now!

* You may have to have purchased the book from Smashwords to leave a review there. If you really want another entry, please contact me and I can give you a coupon for Smashwords (assuming that you already have the book from another platform/source).