Category Archives: Publishing

How to get published, trends in publishing, and the business of writing

K is for Keep on keepin’ on

Yesterday, we talked about jumping in to write. You don’t have to wait for permission or a signed certificate or an engraved invitation: just do it.

Sometimes starting is the hardest part. Lots of people find staring at that blank page intimidating. (Not me: it’s the words that scare me 😉 ). But sometimes it’s not starting: it’s going on.

Good writers make writing look easy, but it’s not. Things worth doing, and worth doing well, seldom are. Writing takes perseverance. Publishing takes even more. It’s easy to get discouraged and feel like you’ll never get this word/scene/book right, or you’ll never get published.

But I like to tell myself the biggest difference between a published author and an unpublished one is persistence. Every athlete and every artist has stories of adversity, whether it’s from opposition from those around them (check) or struggling to better themselves (check). Every time we move past one of those, we get stronger and better—and closer to our goals—as long as we don’t let it defeat us. We gotta keep on keepin’ on.

What do you think? How has opposition helped you get better?

J is for Jumping in

Here’s a complete shocker: J is one of my favorite letters 😉 . But I had a really hard time thinking of something for the letter J. I was going to do an acrostic—but I still couldn’t think of anything for J, and then I’d have to think up even more letters? Blech.

So instead, I’m jumping in. This works on two levels in writing. The first is that we need to jump into our stories. In medias res is the common phrase: in the middle of things. Don’t spend five or fifteen or fifty pages warming up, giving us your characters’ life stories, waiting for something to happen. Readers don’t like to be kept waiting!

But we have to balance between opening too early and too late. We don’t have to have the central conflict on page one, line one. We need to have some sort of conflict in the first section of the book, but sometimes the biggest conflict of the book takes some time to set up. I’ve been more guilty of starting too late: at a point where the conflict is obvious, but the reader doesn’t know the character well enough to sympathize, or at a point where the conflict itself takes a lot of explanation instead of playing out in front of us.

The other way we need to jump into our writing is to do it now. So many people wish they “had time” to write. But having time to write doesn’t mean you have hours of down time (I certainly don’t, with three kids five and under). It means making time by making choices—and making sacrifices. Time you spend writing is time you can’t spend watching TV, playing piano, painting, knitting, practicing the piano, with your children, sleeping, etc.

On the other hand, sometimes it’s not that we’re not ready and willing to make the sacrifice—we’re scared. Guess what: you don’t need a degree or a certificate to write. Heck, I know people who write without a basic grasp of grammar and punctuation. There are no requirements to be a writer: just pen and paper. (Or a laptop. Oh wait, are those requirements? Crap.)

What do you think? Do you jump in?

Photo credits: plunge—Konrad Mostert

Top 5 books of 2010

This year, I set a goal to read at least 25 books (didn’t figure it’d be hard). I beat that and read 40 (woot!). My five favorite books published in 2010:


Cold as Ice
by Stephanie Black


Faithful Place
by Tana French


Heist Society
by Ally Carter (Just fun!)


Russian Winter
by Daphne Kalotay


The Year She Fell
by Alicia Rasley

I still had a number of 2010 books to read when I made this list (including Matched by Ally Condie [since read and enjoyed], Paranormalcy by Kiersten White and The Silence of God by Gale Sears), and I’m looking forward to attacking that ever-growing TBR with a vengeance this year!

What were your favorite books published in 2010? What books from last year do you still have to make time for?

The ideal e-reader

If you haven’t heard, e-readers (eReaders, if you prefer) are the wave of the future in publishing. With the same experience as reading from paper, e-readers take e-books to the next level (and reduce eyestrain FTW).

I’ve accepted that an e-reader is probably in my future—but suddenly, I realized that future is now: I’m in the market for an e-reader.

I actually had planned this post before I began shopping. I was planning to hold out until my “ideal e-reader” became a reality. (In short, it would be a cross between a Kindle and an iPad, with a touchscreen that could be LCD or e-Ink as needed. Don’t look at me that way—I’m not a hardware person! I don’t know/care if that’s impossible!) But I don’t have to hold out until my iRead dream becomes a reality—I have the money for an e-reader right now.

So if we’re shopping for an e-reader now, the main contenders are the Barnes & Noble NOOK and the Amazon Kindle. It doesn’t hurt that they both just dropped their prices under $200.

Here are the basics: they’re both about the same size. They both use e-Ink for an awesome reading experience (I’ve heard). They both wirelessly download books, including many free books in the public domain. They can both take notes on your books, and can hold about 1500 books, they say.

The Kindle is tied to Amazon. It reads mainly Amazon-tied formats, though you can email some types of files (like Word documents) to a Kindle account and have them converted. (I hear they’re free if you have them emailed back and put them on your Kindle through your computer; there’s a nominal fee if you want it delivered wirelessly to your device). Amazon has an awesome selection and on average, slightly lower prices on e-books. It also has a bubble button “hard” keyboard and can read your books to you with text to speech software.

The Nook is tied to Barnes & Noble. In addition to the e-Ink screen, it features a smaller LCD touchscreen. This is where you find your library as well as a virtual keyboard, and even email and some games. For a few select books, you can loan a book one time to another Nook owner for two weeks. The Nook supports more e-book formats—but not Amazon’s proprietary format. You can take it into B&M B&Ns and sample books for free, up to an hour a piece per book, I think. It also features a replaceable battery and a memory card, so you can expand your library even more, should you ever own more than 1500 e-books.

I still have to try out the gadgets in person (Kindles are at some Targets and Nooks are obviously at B&Ns), but I think I’m leaning toward one right now. Still not totally committed.

What do you think? Would you choose the Nook or the Kindle? What would your ideal e-reader look like?

Sorry, this idea’s taken

As you know, there are only fill-in-the-blank number of plots. Millions of novels have been written in the last few centuries, and before that, there were stories and plays and operas and songs and poems.

Face it: even your zombie-vampire-werewolf-romance-action-horror-tragedy isn’t really new or original. (Though it does sound very tragic.) All the ideas ever have already been thought of. They’re taken.

There are a few things we can do with this news. We can worry about trying to prove it wrong and come up with something so completely new and original and unheard-of that people will stop and stare (and probably run away, because that’s what happens). We can hang our heads and trudge off in defeat. Or we can learn to stop worrying and embrace the idea that there may not be anything new under the sun—but we can certainly put our own spin on it.

I know I often come across the seed of an idea and quickly reject it because it’s been done before. But honestly, some of the most popular and best literature we read today isn’t “new”—it’s an unapologetic take on something that’s been done before, and done really well the first time.

For example, it is a truth universally acknowledged that works like Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Jane Austen’s Emma and Pride And Prejudice are classics, or at least fairly well known. Students and scholars alike study these works centuries after their original publication.

And yet we see “retakes,” adaptations and riffs on these works all the time. And they’re not relegated to the rubbish bin, or automatically rejected because “That’s been done before.” If anything, drawing on those classics seems to have helped The Story of Edgar Sawtelle, Clueless, Bridget Jones’s Diary and most especially Pride and Prejudice and Zombies.

All of those stories use classics as their models, often taking their full plots from the original and simply updating or adapting them. And yet all of those stories stand on their own as well, with new elements and a fresh take (usually) from the author. Just because something has been done before doesn’t preclude you from doing it again with a new spin.

What do you think? Have you ever discarded an idea because it had been done before?

Photo by Thomas Levinson

More than love

I love writing. I have loved writing for most of my life. But when it comes to pursuing publication, love is not enough.

Love can help you to write every day (if that’s how you work). Love can help you to learn more. Love can make the world a happy, rosy place—remember when you were in love the first time, or when you first fell for the person you’re with now? Everything feels happy and skippy and you just know you’ll be together forever because you’ve got the right one (baby. Uh huh.).

You can love writing, and write every day—and if that’s what you want to do, great! If that makes you happy, you are a lucky, lucky person. Go forth, write and be happy (and never, never submit for publication. The rejection would make you sad, and if writing for yourself is enough, don’t taint that.).

But it takes more than love to do the work that’s required to reach publication (and beyond—it soooo doesn’t end there!). As the very-soon-to-be-published Kiersten White puts it:

This is where you switch from having a hobby to being a writer. The mind-numbing, hour-after-hour, please-I-don’t-want-to-do-this-anymore-let’s-just-watch-Arrested-Development-on-DVD-instead, how-on-earth-is-writing-this-much-work stage. Anyone can write a book. Everyone who wants to should. But it’s only when you put in the work (and make the sacrifices, and give up your social life and your sanity and occasionally lower your personal grooming standard) to take something that was fun and make it into something that is good that I think you cross from being a hobbyist to being a writer.

Writing is WORK. The best work, sure, but work nonetheless.

To use our love analogy again, let’s say you get married—and then comes reality. Suddenly, the pure euphoria of being together everysecondofeveryday isn’t there. You have an argument. You yell at each other. You don’t feel that overpowering high in his/her presence.

Suddenly, it takes more than love to keep going. It takes commitment. And it takes work. You keep going because you know the love is there, because you know this person/book is worth it—but love isn’t enough to get you there by itself.

How do you stay committed to your work? How do you cope when your love of writing isn’t enough to keep going?

Inspired in part by The Fantasy of Passion by Travis Robertson; photo by Victoria

Getting discouraged

Sometimes it just seems like it’ll never happen. The black marks on the page are going to beat you again, and this work will never be publishable. Or even readable. Or you’ve queried and rewritten and queried and rewritten until you don’t even recognize your story anymore, and still no bites. Or you’ve snagged a killer agent and whipped that MS into shape, but no news really isn’t good news.

We all get discouraged sometimes. I was feeling discouraged a few weeks ago, right before I attended a writing conference last month. It was so good to be reminded that perseverance pays off in publishing, as in just about everything else. And here’s the visual reminder they shared at the conference:

Remember: don’t give up! Surrendering to discouragement is the surest way to fail.

What do you think? How do you recharge when you feel discouraged?

Overcoming writer envy

You pick up the paper hit up Facebook and the latest overnight sensation is the big popular article today. He disdained writing until one of his neighbors said, “You should write a book!” and so he did and now he lives in Aruba off the best-seller’s proceeds.

And you hate him. Ohhhh how we hates the nasty, mean writerses. He didn’t earn that success like I have, we tell ourselves. I’ve been working my butt off and honing my craft and writing and polishing and repolishing and reading and researching and submitting and getting rejected for years, and his book’s not any better than mine (though, admittedly, I haven’t read it)(in the hypothetical, not just because this whole thing is imaginary). Why does he get a twelve-figure advance for his next book that he never wanted to write in the first place?

Okay, now the example is getting extreme. But how often do you read about an author—or read their books—and think, “That could be me—no, it should be. <pout>”? Or you read a beautifully-written book and wish you could write like that, wanting it so bad that even thinking of that author leaves a bitter taste in your mouth <pout>?

Well, it’s time to </pout> .

But their writing is just so masterful! I’ll never measure up. Remember that you are not reading their first draft. Their first drafts might be utter drivel. Published authors are (usually) the ones who take the time and effort to polish drivel into mastery. And also remember that published authors have at least one publishing professional working with them—an editor, an agent, someone who knows what they’re doing, too.

But they didn’t earn it like I have! You don’t know that. The whole “I thought writers were boring stupidheads” story might have come from the PR department. We all (almost all) love overnight success stories. And even if he did think writers were boring stupidheads, we still don’t know how hard he really worked to improve his craft, nor how long it took for him to reach that publishing finish line.

But . . . I’ll never be that successful. Ah, now we’re getting somewhere. That’s the real issue here, isn’t it? We’re afraid that either a.) his success diminishes our own, or our own chances or b.) we’re just flat-out not that good, or lucky, or whatever. Could it be that we’re not really cut out for this whole publishing thing?

Come on, now. Chin up. Some of us spend longer earning our stripes—some of us 11,000 rejections longer. Usually, the writers who get published are the ones who persevered.

I guess it all boils down to the fact that you really can’t judge a book by its cover—and you can’t measure yourself against others.

How do you experience writer envy? How do you overcome it?

Photo by Eric Tastad